Personnel is a major expense for insurers, so if a company can take a major function within the organization, do it more efficiently and with fewer errors, fewer people, and less legal exposure, that’s a huge gain, points out Gallo.
This will become critical because the number of workers entering the insurance industry today is declining. One of Gallo’s clients was lamenting the fact his part of the insurance business is not considered sexy by potential workers, even though it is a critical function.
"It’s difficult to recruit to his part of the business, let alone persuade people from other parts of the company to join him," he says.
That is one reason to take a serious look at BPM, asserts Gallo.
"If he doesn’t find a better way to be better, faster, and more effective, he is going to suffer from a shortage of manpower," says Gallo. "The efficiency and consistency that is brought into the equation as a result of BPM is critical when you look at things such as an aging work force and the reality that there are types of work people don’t want to do anymore. BPM is meant to address those issues in the same way people didn’t want to work on assembly lines forever and robotics came in to take some of the drudgery out of those jobs."
When it comes to labor, Danielson maintains, it is important to look at what employees are doing and how they can do their work smarter and revisit the model the company operates under.
"To do [BPM], you need to spend time and effort—invest a dollar today and see the fruits of your labor later," he says. "It’s not something you can do without an investment."
Organizations also need to look at their rate of return. If they are going to get a marginal return on investment, Danielson believes BPM projects can be too disruptive to go down a path that doesn’t offer great rewards.
"The bar isn’t set high enough if it’s only incremental improvement," he says. "This type of change in the process and eliminating whole steps is painful for an organization, and you need to get a rate of return for the investment. When people lay out programs, they need to demand [ROI] and plan for the result rather than the incremental change you might see."
Lee was brought to Meadowbrook to implement the Adeptia BPM tool three years ago and to manage the projects that would be utilizing the services the tool would provide.
"The primary goal from the beginning was to automate the existing manual processes related to bringing data from external sources into our environment and also from other systems that weren’t connected," says Lee.
Meadowbrook had grown over the previous years, and Lee indicates, not all the systems talked to each other nor was there an automatic integration path.
"A customer would send us data in an Excel spreadsheet; our people would print out the spreadsheet and then keypunch that data back into the policy management system or into the claims processing system," relates Lee. Meadowbrook’s goal was to load that data into the back-end systems and eliminate as much manual intervention as possible to minimize human error.
There is hesitancy within any organization to adopt such major changes, Lee notes, citing the well-worn rebuttal: "This is the way we’ve always done it."
Meadowbrook used Adeptia as leverage to get people not just to automate the process but to look at how things were done and then redesign the process.
"The only thing worse than a broken process is automating a broken process," says Lee. "If you are going to the trouble of automating this step, let’s take a look at what we are trying to do and try to get some gains."
The biggest learning curve for departments, Lee continues, is thinking about how they can do the job differently. Meadowbrook spent a lot of time detailing to business users what BPM can do for them.
"In some cases, [users] just weren’t ready for everything, so we had to go incrementally," he says. "It depends on the comfort level of the business community. For some folks it took only one instance of getting changes, and they jumped in with both feet and have since come back and asked us whether [the system] could do other things. Part of my job is to get business users to understand what the tool provides and the benefits we can give them from a business standpoint if we use it properly."